The Evolution of Healthcare?
Stacey L. Ishman, MD, and Paul M. Imber, DO With an array of healthcare reforms being implemented in our nation, many wonder what the final outcome will be. Will it be an improvement or a weakening of our already fragile system? What additional reforms are on the horizon, and can we learn from the experiences of other countries? Attendees at the recent Annual Meeting & OTO EXPO in San Francisco were given the opportunity to hear about and discuss these very questions at a miniseminar, titled “Healthcare for All? Economics, Politics, and Delivery Systems.” The miniseminar, which was sponsored by the Board of Governors’ Legislative Representatives Committee, provided an evidence-based comparison of worldwide government healthcare systems and perspectives on the challenges and successes associated with various delivery models, their impact on otolaryngologist—head and neck surgeons and their patients, and the politics surrounding the single-payer healthcare debate in the United States. The miniseminar’s panelists collectively offered expertise from a wide range of healthcare systems including private, academic, and government programs for the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Panelists included moderator Mimi S. Kokoska, MD, MHCM, VISN 11 chief surgical consultant, Veterans Affairs, and professor at Indiana University; Joy Trimmer, JD, senior director of AAO-HNS Government Affairs; Lee D. Eisenberg, MD, MPH, past AAO-HNS board coordinator for Governmental Relations and member of ENT and Allergy Associates, LLP; Brendan C. Stack, Jr., MD, professor and vice chairman of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; S. Mark Taylor, MD, MSc, MHCM, senior physician executive, Ontario, Canada; and Martin J. Burton, DM, MA, FRCS, consultant otolaryngologist, Radcliffe NHS Trust and senior lecturer at the University of Oxford. The miniseminar concluded with an interactive session where two key questions were posed to the audience. When attendees were asked if they favored or opposed legislation to establish a national health insurance program, 68 percent indicated their support for such a system. This percentage is slightly higher than the 59 percent approval rating garnered when the same question was posed to a group of nearly 2,000 physicians in a 2007 Annals of Internal Medicine study. As a follow-up, the audience was then asked their preferred structure for a nationalized healthcare system. Responses indicated: 37 percent supported a government-run single payer system without government ownership or employment of providers (similar to Medicare); 30 percent supported select government ownership of facilities and employees to “compete” with private facilities and employees; 20 percent supported complete privatization; and 13 percent supported government-owned and paid facilities and employees (similar to the VA or DOD). Does this mean the majority of our members are ready for a change? Is the desire for change a result of disappointment and dissatisfaction with the current system? If this is the case, we can think of no better reason to attend the AAO-HNS BOG Spring Meeting and Advocacy Day (May 6-8, 2012). Help us raise our voice on Capitol Hill and influence positive change in our healthcare system.
Stacey L. Ishman, MD, and Paul M. Imber, DO
With an array of healthcare reforms being implemented in our nation, many wonder what the final outcome will be. Will it be an improvement or a weakening of our already fragile system? What additional reforms are on the horizon, and can we learn from the experiences of other countries?
Attendees at the recent Annual Meeting & OTO EXPO in San Francisco were given the opportunity to hear about and discuss these very questions at a miniseminar, titled “Healthcare for All? Economics, Politics, and Delivery Systems.” The miniseminar, which was sponsored by the Board of Governors’ Legislative Representatives Committee, provided an evidence-based comparison of worldwide government healthcare systems and perspectives on the challenges and successes associated with various delivery models, their impact on otolaryngologist—head and neck surgeons and their patients, and the politics surrounding the single-payer healthcare debate in the United States.
The miniseminar’s panelists collectively offered expertise from a wide range of healthcare systems including private, academic, and government programs for the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Panelists included moderator Mimi S. Kokoska, MD, MHCM, VISN 11 chief surgical consultant, Veterans Affairs, and professor at Indiana University; Joy Trimmer, JD, senior director of AAO-HNS Government Affairs; Lee D. Eisenberg, MD, MPH, past AAO-HNS board coordinator for Governmental Relations and member of ENT and Allergy Associates, LLP; Brendan C. Stack, Jr., MD, professor and vice chairman of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; S. Mark Taylor, MD, MSc, MHCM, senior physician executive, Ontario, Canada; and Martin J. Burton, DM, MA, FRCS, consultant otolaryngologist, Radcliffe NHS Trust and senior lecturer at the University of Oxford.
The miniseminar concluded with an interactive session where two key questions were posed to the audience. When attendees were asked if they favored or opposed legislation to establish a national health insurance program, 68 percent indicated their support for such a system. This percentage is slightly higher than the 59 percent approval rating garnered when the same question was posed to a group of nearly 2,000 physicians in a 2007 Annals of Internal Medicine study.
As a follow-up, the audience was then asked their preferred structure for a nationalized healthcare system. Responses indicated:
- 37 percent supported a government-run single payer system without government ownership or employment of providers (similar to Medicare);
- 30 percent supported select government ownership of facilities and employees to “compete” with private facilities and employees;
- 20 percent supported complete privatization; and
- 13 percent supported government-owned and paid facilities and employees (similar to the VA or DOD).
Does this mean the majority of our members are ready for a change? Is the desire for change a result of disappointment and dissatisfaction with the current system? If this is the case, we can think of no better reason to attend the AAO-HNS BOG Spring Meeting and Advocacy Day (May 6-8, 2012). Help us raise our voice on Capitol Hill and influence positive change in our healthcare system.