You Chose Wisely!
Rahul K. Shah, MD George Washington University School of Medicine Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC There has been tremendous media attention in the past year discussing the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation’s Choosing Wisely® campaign. We have discussed this campaign in prior Bulletin articles along with the Foundation’s intended participation and, as such, we wanted to update you on this initiative. The Choosing Wisely campaign is based on the fact that overuse exists in our healthcare system. Who best to curb such overuse than the healthcare providers themselves? This, of course, resonates with physician organizations such as our Foundation, as we would like to have a vested interest in looking at our own practices. Essentially, the campaign is asking healthcare professionals and their organizations to look at the tests and procedures physicians recommend and how they affect patients. As we have previously discussed, the Choosing Wisely campaign is moving into its second phase. Our Foundation is part of this phase and our Board has identified five specific procedures, tests, or treatments to be submitted to the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely campaign. The goal of submitting five such instances to the campaign is to draw attention to these procedures, tests, and treatments. With all medical specialties looking at these conditions in aggregate, we as a healthcare team can reduce overuse. In the first phase of the campaign, 45 tests and procedures were identified by nine medical specialties as potentially being overused. The initial nine specialties that participated in the Choosing Wisely campaign were the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Nephrology, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. For the second phase of the campaign, our Foundation was the first surgical society to have joined and agreed to develop a list of five items whose necessity should be questioned and discussed. Herein lies the rub. For a surgical specialty with a tremendous amount of outpatient care, such as ours, and with such disparate technical procedures under our umbrellas—pediatric airway, microvascular reconstruction, cosmetic plastic surgery, robotic surgery, allergy evaluations and treatment, etc.—one can begin to be lost with the prospect of trying to identify five items. The final list that our Board will decide upon will be released soon. However, this article is meant to highlight our Foundation’s leadership by participating in the Choosing Wisely campaign and also to explain how we arrived at the measures that were presented to the Board for voting/approval. Per the Academy, this project was assigned to the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement (PSQI) Committee to spearhead the effort. From here, the PSQI committee solicited the input of members of the Specialty Society Advisory Council (SSAC), the Guidelines Development Task Force (GDTF), and members of each of the AAO-HNS/F committees. The final five items selected were based on the support of the above groups and available supporting evidence, such as AAO-HNSF clinical practice guidelines. When the Board votes and approves the final list of topics that our Foundation submits to the Choosing Wisely campaign, we want our membership to be absolutely confident that all stakeholders within the AAO-HNSF and the associated societies have had an opportunity to submit topics and have helped in the overall process of choosing items submitted to the ABIM Foundation. Personally, I could not be more pleased at the ability of an organization with practices as diverse as ours to be able to reach consensus on a list of topics examining our practice patterns in only a couple of months. It is our membership’s ability to introspectively examine our own practices for the ultimate benefit of our patients that is most impressive to me and to other organizations nationally. We encourage members to write us with any topic of interest and we will try to research and discuss the issue. Members’ names are published only after they have been contacted directly by Academy staff and have given consent to the use of their names. Email the Academy at qualityimprovement@entnet.org to engage us in a patient safety and quality discussion that is pertinent to your practice.
Rahul K. Shah, MD
George Washington University School of Medicine
Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC
The Choosing Wisely campaign is based on the fact that overuse exists in our healthcare system. Who best to curb such overuse than the healthcare providers themselves? This, of course, resonates with physician organizations such as our Foundation, as we would like to have a vested interest in looking at our own practices. Essentially, the campaign is asking healthcare professionals and their organizations to look at the tests and procedures physicians recommend and how they affect patients.
As we have previously discussed, the Choosing Wisely campaign is moving into its second phase. Our Foundation is part of this phase and our Board has identified five specific procedures, tests, or treatments to be submitted to the ABIM Foundation’s Choosing Wisely campaign. The goal of submitting five such instances to the campaign is to draw attention to these procedures, tests, and treatments. With all medical specialties looking at these conditions in aggregate, we as a healthcare team can reduce overuse.
In the first phase of the campaign, 45 tests and procedures were identified by nine medical specialties as potentially being overused. The initial nine specialties that participated in the Choosing Wisely campaign were the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Nephrology, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
For the second phase of the campaign, our Foundation was the first surgical society to have joined and agreed to develop a list of five items whose necessity should be questioned and discussed. Herein lies the rub. For a surgical specialty with a tremendous amount of outpatient care, such as ours, and with such disparate technical procedures under our umbrellas—pediatric airway, microvascular reconstruction, cosmetic plastic surgery, robotic surgery, allergy evaluations and treatment, etc.—one can begin to be lost with the prospect of trying to identify five items.
The final list that our Board will decide upon will be released soon. However, this article is meant to highlight our Foundation’s leadership by participating in the Choosing Wisely campaign and also to explain how we arrived at the measures that were presented to the Board for voting/approval. Per the Academy, this project was assigned to the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement (PSQI) Committee to spearhead the effort. From here, the PSQI committee solicited the input of members of the Specialty Society Advisory Council (SSAC), the Guidelines Development Task Force (GDTF), and members of each of the AAO-HNS/F committees. The final five items selected were based on the support of the above groups and available supporting evidence, such as AAO-HNSF clinical practice guidelines.
When the Board votes and approves the final list of topics that our Foundation submits to the Choosing Wisely campaign, we want our membership to be absolutely confident that all stakeholders within the AAO-HNSF and the associated societies have had an opportunity to submit topics and have helped in the overall process of choosing items submitted to the ABIM Foundation. Personally, I could not be more pleased at the ability of an organization with practices as diverse as ours to be able to reach consensus on a list of topics examining our practice patterns in only a couple of months. It is our membership’s ability to introspectively examine our own practices for the ultimate benefit of our patients that is most impressive to me and to other organizations nationally.