Advocacy Promotes Better Patient Care
Getting involved in the AAO-HNS advocacy opportunities: a bit of time. Ensuring a system of outstanding patient care: priceless. The current status of our healthcare system in the United States is one of uncertainty and the topic of much debate. Medicare, with the unsustainable Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula, is one such example of a system that affects our ability to practice and, ultimately, the health of our patients. The upcoming elections both locally and nationally will provide us one vehicle to participate in the healthcare discussion. However, your potential to influence this system can be amplified by participating in the AAO-HNS-related committees available to all of our members. This participation can occur on both the local and national levels and can have a measurable effect on the politics that shape our system of healthcare. Your Academy’s primary grassroots vehicle for member advocacy is the Board of Governors (BOG). The BOG has representation from nearly all state and local societies across the United States. Each local society has three representatives on the BOG, a governor (often, but not necessarily, the president of the local society), a legislative rep, and a public relations rep. These representatives will meet with their counterparts from other state societies twice a year at the BOG Meeting in Washington, DC, and the AAO-HNSF’s annual meeting in the fall. Members will serve on committees of the BOG including the Socioeconomic and Grassroots (SEGR) and Legislative Representatives. These committees take on the issues that affect our ability to practice. Regularly scheduled conference calls and legislative alerts from our Academy office keep members apprised of issues as they arise and provide our state societies with information gleaned from other states’ experiences. This information is powerful and practical and can have an extraordinary impact. The BOG has been working to reorganize and improve the state societies’ relationship with the BOG, attempting to create a regional system of societies that can better serve their respective members. This would mimic, to some degree, the CMS regional organization. Being involved in your local society and developing a system to communicate issues can help provide our patients with the care they need. An example of this occurred recently in Connecticut when the CMS regional interpretation on the use of Botox for spasmodic dysphonia adversely affected our Medicare population and would have resulted in these patients, many on fixed incomes, having to pay hundreds of dollars out of pocket for their laryngeal Botox treatments. The Connecticut ENT Society, working with our national AAO-HNS office and the 3P work group, was able to quickly work through our Connecticut Society’s CAC representative, Raymond Winicki, MD, to reverse the decision in about three weeks. Our patients were extremely grateful and ultimately well cared for. This was all made possible by a system where clinicians in a local society got involved and were able to help fellow members open the appropriate lines of communication to resolve the issue. Besides the BOG, there are many other varied groups that members can participate in, all of which can provide the opportunity to advocate for our practices and our patients. The Women in Otolaryngology Section (WIO), for example, provides a forum specifically advocating for our women providers. The Section for Residents and Fellows-in-Training (SRF) is an excellent initiation for our members still in training. This section helps to introduce the ongoing issues to our future providers and helps to deliver to the Academy the issues affecting our trainees. The importance of embedding the concept of advocacy as a core competency in our young physicians’ training is essential if we intend to continue to hold a position of strength in the healthcare debate. The opportunities to participate within the Academy are vast. Research and clinical committees provide a vital link to updated content for our members and will continue to help with requirements, such as Maintenance of Certification. Clinical guidelines development continues and needs dedicated participants to accomplish this necessary work. The time and effort required to participate in these Academy committees are varied, but ultimately provide a vital service for our members. The constant need for our members’ participation in our local and national advocacy efforts will continue as long as we have political opinions as to how the healthcare issues should be handled in our country. This election year highlights our need to be involved. The effort needed may be a slight burden on our time; the outcome for our patients could be priceless.
Getting involved in the AAO-HNS advocacy opportunities: a bit of time. Ensuring a system of outstanding patient care: priceless.
The current status of our healthcare system in the United States is one of uncertainty and the topic of much debate. Medicare, with the unsustainable Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula, is one such example of a system that affects our ability to practice and, ultimately, the health of our patients. The upcoming elections both locally and nationally will provide us one vehicle to participate in the healthcare discussion. However, your potential to influence this system can be amplified by participating in the AAO-HNS-related committees available to all of our members. This participation can occur on both the local and national levels and can have a measurable effect on the politics that shape our system of healthcare.
Your Academy’s primary grassroots vehicle for member advocacy is the Board of Governors (BOG). The BOG has representation from nearly all state and local societies across the United States. Each local society has three representatives on the BOG, a governor (often, but not necessarily, the president of the local society), a legislative rep, and a public relations rep. These representatives will meet with their counterparts from other state societies twice a year at the BOG Meeting in Washington, DC, and the AAO-HNSF’s annual meeting in the fall. Members will serve on committees of the BOG including the Socioeconomic and Grassroots (SEGR) and Legislative Representatives. These committees take on the issues that affect our ability to practice. Regularly scheduled conference calls and legislative alerts from our Academy office keep members apprised of issues as they arise and provide our state societies with information gleaned from other states’ experiences. This information is powerful and practical and can have an extraordinary impact.
The BOG has been working to reorganize and improve the state societies’ relationship with the BOG, attempting to create a regional system of societies that can better serve their respective members. This would mimic, to some degree, the CMS regional organization. Being involved in your local society and developing a system to communicate issues can help provide our patients with the care they need. An example of this occurred recently in Connecticut when the CMS regional interpretation on the use of Botox for spasmodic dysphonia adversely affected our Medicare population and would have resulted in these patients, many on fixed incomes, having to pay hundreds of dollars out of pocket for their laryngeal Botox treatments. The Connecticut ENT Society, working with our national AAO-HNS office and the 3P work group, was able to quickly work through our Connecticut Society’s CAC representative, Raymond Winicki, MD, to reverse the decision in about three weeks. Our patients were extremely grateful and ultimately well cared for. This was all made possible by a system where clinicians in a local society got involved and were able to help fellow members open the appropriate lines of communication to resolve the issue.
Besides the BOG, there are many other varied groups that members can participate in, all of which can provide the opportunity to advocate for our practices and our patients. The Women in Otolaryngology Section (WIO), for example, provides a forum specifically advocating for our women providers. The Section for Residents and Fellows-in-Training (SRF) is an excellent initiation for our members still in training. This section helps to introduce the ongoing issues to our future providers and helps to deliver to the Academy the issues affecting our trainees. The importance of embedding the concept of advocacy as a core competency in our young physicians’ training is essential if we intend to continue to hold a position of strength in the healthcare debate.
The opportunities to participate within the Academy are vast. Research and clinical committees provide a vital link to updated content for our members and will continue to help with requirements, such as Maintenance of Certification. Clinical guidelines development continues and needs dedicated participants to accomplish this necessary work. The time and effort required to participate in these Academy committees are varied, but ultimately provide a vital service for our members. The constant need for our members’ participation in our local and national advocacy efforts will continue as long as we have political opinions as to how the healthcare issues should be handled in our country. This election year highlights our need to be involved. The effort needed may be a slight burden on our time; the outcome for our patients could be priceless.