Published: November 4, 2015

Humanitarian mission trip to Cameroon

I recently had the opportunity of a lifetime to participate in a two-week otolaryngology mission trip to Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon, with my mentor, Wayne M. Koch, MD, in April 2015. Dr. Koch has a long-standing relationship wth Mbingo Baptist Hospital (MBH) and travels there a number of times a year.


By Zhen Gooi, MBBS, MD, Clinical Fellow, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Resident Travel Grant Awardee

Dr. Gooi spent two weeks at Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon, as part of a mission trip performing head and neck oncology procedures, including repairing mandibular fractures. From left to right Keafon Nchifor, MD, otolaryngology resident; Tony Mwenyemali, MD, general surgery resident; Zhen Gooi, MD; and Desiree, OR scrub tech.Dr. Gooi spent two weeks at Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon, as part of a mission trip performing head and neck oncology procedures, including repairing mandibular fractures. From left to right Keafon Nchifor, MD, otolaryngology resident; Tony Mwenyemali, MD, general surgery resident; Zhen Gooi, MD; and Desiree, OR scrub tech.

I recently had the opportunity of a lifetime to participate in a two-week otolaryngology mission trip to Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon, with my mentor, Wayne M. Koch, MD, in April 2015. Dr. Koch has a long-standing relationship wth Mbingo Baptist Hospital (MBH) and travels there a number of times a year.

MBH is operated under the auspices of the Cameroon Baptist Convention, and has a number of medical training programs, including a general surgery residency administered by the Pan-African Academy of Christian Surgeons. We operated on a daily basis except for Sundays and many of the cases had been lined up in advance by the local otolaryngologist, Dr. Acha, in anticipation of Dr. Koch’s arrival. We dealt with the whole spectrum of head and neck surgical oncology in addition to repairing a number of mandibular fractures. The hospital is well run and clean, but is by no means of “Western” standard in terms of equipment. The surgical ward has but one single trash can. For dressing supplies, one walks to the far side of the ward where gauze is dispensed sparingly from a metal can by a watchful nurse.

There is an incredible amount of resourcefulness borne out of necessity. Almost every surgical instrument is recycled, from the Bovie tips, to the suction tubings and endotracheal tubes. Wastage is at a bare minimum, in contrast to the wonton culture of “use and dispose” that we practice in North America. We had brought a number of battery-operated electrolarynxes, which we gave to the four laryngectomy patients whom we operated on, and it was gratifying to see their smiles when they were able to “‘voice.”

My interaction with the local population was limited due to my lack of language skills. Part of my mission involved studying the prevalence of oral HPV infection in the local population with HIV, as part of a pilot research project that had been approved by the hospital IRB. This required getting the patients to answer some brief questions and perform oral rinses. Many could not state their age, instead handing over their government-issued identity cards to my translator for further investigation.

Ironically, culture shock did not strike me in Cameroon, but did when I landed in Dulles International Airport and the subsequent days thereafter. The well-lit, air conditioned hospital corridors, people being preoccupied with their smartphones, and the five-lane I-495 expressway stood in stark contrast to everything I had experienced over the past weeks. Every pair of gloves I reached for, every single-use suture I disposed felt like I was an industrial polluter.

I have gained an immense amount of respect for the medical staff and the numerous full-time medical volunteers who devote their time and energy to MBH and soldier on cheerfully despite the numerous equipment shortages. I would like to thank the AAO-HNSF Humanitarian Efforts Committee for the generous funding given to offset my travel expenses for this medical mission.

 

 


More from November 2015 - Vol. 34, No. 10

AAO-HNSF publishes methodology for developing clinical consensus statements
Since 2010, the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) has published five clinical consensus statements (CCSs) in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, including: Diagnosis and Management of Nasal Valve Compromise (2010); CT Imaging Indications for Paranasal Sinus Disease (2012); Tracheostomy Care (2012); Pediatric Chronic Rhinosinusitis (2014); and this month Septoplasty with or without Inferior Turbinoplasty (2015). The CCS development manual supplement also appears in this month’s issue. The manual describes the methodology used by the AAO-HNSF to promote rapid and consistent development of CCSs when the evidence is lacking for development of a clinical practice guideline (CPG). A CCS integrates structured expert opinions with the existing literature to try and provide some clarification on points that are quality improvement opportunities related to a particular topic. In contrast to CPGs, which are based primarily on high-level evidence, clinical consensus statements are more applicable to situations where evidence is limited or lacking, yet there are still opportunities to reduce uncertainty and improve quality of care. Much like the AAO-HNSF Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition: A Quality-Driven Approach for Translating Evidence into Action, which has now been cited 119 times, the goal of the Clinical Consensus Statement Development Manual is to provide readers with the detailed methodology used by the AAO-HNSF to develop its clinical consensus statements. Publication of the manual facilitates transparency of the AAO-HNSF process and also provides a tool for other organizations to replicate our process. In summary, the AAO-HNSF utilizes a modified Delphi Survey Method to develop its CCSs. The Delphi Method involves using multiple anonymous surveys to assess for objective consensus within an expert panel. This rigorous and standardized approach minimized bias and facilitated content expert consensus. While the CCS development manual contains specific practices relevant to the AAO-HNSF, we believe that the principles explained therein will be a valuable tool for our Members, the subspecialty societies, and to external organizations as well. Comparison of key characteristics of consensus statements vs. guidelines* Characteristic Clinical consensus statement Clinical practice guideline Primary output Statements of fact based on best evidence and expert consensus Recommendations for action based on best evidence and explicit consideration of benefits, harms, values, and preferences Level of evidence Observational studies and expert consensus; higher levels of evidence when available Systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials; lower level evidence as needed for research gaps Size of development group 8 to 10; possibly more 15 to 20 Composition of development group Otolaryngologists; content experts a majority; may include other disciplines as needed Multidisciplinary, including consumers; content experts a minority; includes all stakeholders in the target audience Perspective of development group member Member serves as a content expert based on individual knowledge and experience Member advocates for the discipline or constituency they were appointed to represent Time frame 6 to 8 months 12 to 18 months Meeting venues Conference calls and electronic mail In-person meetings, conference calls, and electronic mail External review Limited review by relevant stakeholders Extensive review by all stakeholders, including open public comment *From the AAO-HNSF Clinical Consensus Statement Development Manual (2015). (In press)